Monday, October 29, 2007

Father Christmas and Copernicus

It is common belief, amongst the youngest of our population, that a person called Father Christmas exists. I too, was no exception to this case. Until the age of six I was deeply rooted in the belief that Santa Claus did exist. All those month-long preparations for Christmas lists, decorations and shopping were all in anticipation for that one night of 24th December. The milk, cookies and carrots would be left out by 9, and an hour later I would be tucked into bed, too excited to sleep. The next morning the presents would be there, under the tree, waiting for me. When I turned six, however, my world came crashing down when I was told (by my then-evil sister) that Father Christmas did not exist. At first I could not believe it. Nothing made sense without Santa Claus – where did all the presents come from!? But when I began to reason his existence, some things did not seem to fit. How was it possible that each and every child around the world got a gift exactly on the same night? How were there Santa Clauses at each and every street corner? How did the post reach the North Pole, and more importantly, how could Santa read my writing?! It was nevertheless strange for me to grasp the concept that my parents were the ones delivering the presents and not the happy fat man in the red suit. The destruction of belief in Father Christmas came from my sister’s knowledge which I now had, as well as reasoning from myself. In the same way, when Nicolas Copernicus said that the earth was not the centre of the universe, he too, crashed the world of many people. He said that the earth rotates around the sun and he confirmed this by noticing the behaviour of movements of two particular stars (the planets Mercury and Venus). This came as a great shock and people refused to believe him as the Pope himself believed that the earth was the centre of the universe. His theory went against the belief of religion and philosophy of that time. The previous belief was so strong even though there was no evidence for it. Such a strong destruction of belief brought about a strong sense of denial and many people refused to accept the discovery until many years later. Therefore it is observed that Copernicus’s discovery proved the belief of that time period wrong. It is due to the evidence that the theory was soon accepted. Similarly, when a child discovers that Father Christmas does not exist, it can relate to Copernicus. It is through other’s knowledge, reasoning, self knowledge and the ability to learn, absorb and comprehend information that allows us to reconsider our some times misguided belief.

1 comment:

Hugh Nicklin said...

This was very well expresed. Svereal of the points you make I have discussed in my comment on Tarun's piece, and you should look at them; in particular look at what i say about the silliness or otherwise of the geocentric theory.

You describe nicely the way the Father Christmas hypothesis was challenged by the non-FC hypothesis. Reason, observation and something else I am struggling to name did the trick against FC. I am struggling to name the process by which you understand that apparently authoritative language had deceived you, and had been intended to do so. The history teacher's mantra ('who's telling me? Does he know what he's talking about? Has he any reason to lie?) is relevant here. You came to understand that those who were telling you had a reason to lie, which was that they loved you and wanted you to enjoy the lovely story of Father Chistmas as long as possible. Was this because grown ups have sensed the existence of 'epistemological entropy' (see comment to Tarun) and want to protect children from the angst it may bring.

Do dictators, I wonder, stress 'family values' for the same reason? Do 'Fathers of their People' try to set a cosy context for their people's lives equivalent to the happiness of believing that Father Christmas is coming?

Buddha, of course, held out nothingness as the goal to aim for. I wonder if one can speak of nothingness as an illusion forming a small part of the greater illusion which is reality?

What did Luther mean by saying that Erasmus looked at reality like a cow looks at a barn door?

Moo.